Toyota
Matrix

U.S. fuel economy and specifications from the EPA.

Toyota Matrix as sold in the 2000s
29Best combined MPG2005 model year
2003–2013Model years11 with EPA ratings
41Rated configurationsDrive, transmission and engine
1.8–2.4 LEngine sizeDisplacement

Best combined MPG by model year

The highest EPA rating among each year's configurations.

2003 28 MPG
2004 28 MPG
2005 29 MPG
2006 29 MPG
2007 29 MPG
2008 29 MPG
2009 28 MPG
2010 28 MPG
2011 29 MPG
2012 29 MPG
2013 29 MPG

5 configurations.

Front-Wheel Drive · Automatic 4-spd

Regular gasoline · Small Station Wagons

Combined MPG
27
Engine displacement
1.8 L
Cylinders
4
EPA listing for this configuration: 2013, Front-Wheel Drive, Automatic 4-spd, 1.8 L, Regular

Front-Wheel Drive · Manual 5-spd

Regular gasoline · Small Station Wagons

Combined MPG
29
Engine displacement
1.8 L
Cylinders
4
EPA listing for this configuration: 2013, Front-Wheel Drive, Manual 5-spd, 1.8 L, Regular

All-Wheel Drive · Automatic 4-spd

Regular gasoline · Small Station Wagons

Combined MPG
22
Engine displacement
2.4 L
Cylinders
4
EPA listing for this configuration: 2013, All-Wheel Drive, Automatic 4-spd, 2.4 L, Regular

Front-Wheel Drive · Manual 5-spd

Regular gasoline · Small Station Wagons

Combined MPG
24
Engine displacement
2.4 L
Cylinders
4
EPA listing for this configuration: 2013, Front-Wheel Drive, Manual 5-spd, 2.4 L, Regular

Front-Wheel Drive · Automatic (S5)

Regular gasoline · Small Station Wagons

Combined MPG
24
Engine displacement
2.4 L
Cylinders
4
EPA listing for this configuration: 2013, Front-Wheel Drive, Automatic (S5), 2.4 L, Regular

More California data